Mesoderm Induction II

As we discussed previously, there is strong evidence favoring involvement of endogenous Vg1 in mesoderm induction. However, testing this hypothesis has been very difficult due to the difficulties in producing processed VG-1 protein for use in treating animal explants. As discussed previously, RNA made from chimeric constructs incorporating a cleavage site from BMP has been used in autoinduction experiments. Although processing is enhanced by these constructs, the secretion of soluble, processed Vg1 is inefficient in oocytes injected with BMP4-Vg1 mRNA (Dale et al., 1993). This brings into question whether induction was mediated by secreted Vg1 in the autoinduction experiments. Hence, Kessler and Melton (1995) have devised a means to make soluble, biologically-active Vg1 to apply to animal pole explants.

The Vg1 was made from an activin ß B-Vg1 hybrid. The activin ß B element contained both a signal sequence that mediates secretion and a cleavage site. This facilitated both the processing and secretion of Vg1 protein in oocytes injected with activin ß B-Vg1 mRNA (Fig. 1, Kessler and Melton, 1995). Supernatant from injected oocytes was tested for its mesoderm-inducing activity on explanted animal poles. The effects of the supernatant are illustrated in Fig. 2 (Kessler and Melton, 1995). The explants elongated, expressed mesoderm-specific markers, and produced notochord, somitic muscle and neural tissue.

To determine whether the effects of mature Vg1 are mediated by the activin receptor, two experiments were conducted. First, animal pole explants of embryos that had been injected with a truncated activin receptor (tAR) were treated with Vg1-containing supernatant. The truncated receptor blocked mesoderm induction by mature Vg1. A truncated FGF receptor also blocked induction by this factor. This suggests that the abilities of these two receptors to block mesoderm induction in the embryo reflect their effects on endogenous Vg1 signaling.

Does the activin receptor function as the endogenous Vg1 receptor? To examine this possibility, a version of the Xenopus activin II receptor that had an epitope of MYC attached to it (XARmyc) was expressed in Xenopus oocytes. (This approach is called epitope tagging.) The binding of radioactive Vg1 or activin to XARmyc was then assessed. The epitope tag enabled the XARmyc with bound ligand to be immunoprecipitated using an antibody to MYC. The specificity of binding was assessed by competition using excess unlabeled ligand. As shown in Fig. 3 (Kessler and Melton, 1995) , activin binds avidly to the receptor, but Vg1 does not. Furthermore, unlabeled Vg1 fails to compete for activin binding. These results suggest that (1) the activin receptor is not a Vg1 receptor and (2) the effects of the truncated activin receptor on Vg1 signaling are probably mediated through an interaction between the truncated activin receptor and an endogenous Vg1-specific receptor.

As we have previously discussed, follistatin is an inhibitor of activin. Previous investigations of the effects of follistatin have utilized mammalian follistatin. However, Kessler and Melton (1995) have examined the effects of Xenopus follistatin on both normal development and response of animal pole explants to activin and Vg1. Injection of follistatin mRNA into embryos at the two-cell stage perturbed posterior development, but appeared to enhance anterior dorsal development (Fig. 4, Kessler and Melton, 1995). Normal expression of dorsal mesodermal markers was detected. Thus, endogenous induction of dorsal mesoderm is not inhibited, and a role for activin in dorsal mesoderm induction is not supported by these results. Follistatin was unable to block the effects of Vg1 on animal pole explants, although it blocked the effects of activin (Kessler and Melton, 1995, Fig. 5). Once again, these results cast doubt on the role of activin and support a role for Vg1 in mesoderm induction. These results may also indicate that follistatin is involved in patterning of the mesoderm.

Kessler and Melton (1995) propose that the rotation of the cortex at fertilization triggers localized processing of Vg1 precursor, which imparts on those cells functionality as the Nieuwkoop center. Mature Vg1 ligand secreted from the Nieuwkoop center would induce the Spemann organizer. The Spemann organizer, in turn, would induce neural tissue and also dorsalize lateral mesoderm.

Regionalization of the Mesoderm


The mesoderm is a complex array of tissue-types in three primary domains: dorsal, ventrolateral, and ventral. It is likely given the large number of factors that are capable of inducing mesoderm (see Slack, 1994, Table 2) that the regional character of the mesoderm is a result of the combinatorial action of the endogenous correlates of these factors. We do not have time to discuss the putative roles of all of these factors. Instead, we will discuss briefly their diversity and discuss selected factors in some detail. In addition to Vg1, the messenger RNAs for BMP-2 , BMP-4, FGF-2, FGF-4, Wnt-11, and noggin are present in the egg. Thus, they are present during the time when mesoderm induction is initiated. The bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are TGF-ß-related proteins. BMP-4 induces ventral mesoderm, suppresses induction of dorsal mesoderm by activin and inhibits dorsoanterior development of embryos, suggesting that it is a ventralizing factor. The messengers encoding the BMPs are not localized in the vegetal hemisphere, which casts some doubt on their role in mesoderm induction. However, expression of a dominant-negative BMP-4 receptor blocked mesoderm induction by BMP-4 in isolated animal caps and prevented ventralization of embryos by BMP-4. Overexpression of the receptor in embryos caused mesoderm to be dorsalized. These results suggest that BMP-4 may be involved in ventralization of the mesoderm by counteracting the dorsalizing signals (for review, see Kessler and Melton, 1994).

The fibroblast growth factors induce ventrolateral mesoderm. Expression of dominant-negative FGF receptor inhibits mesoderm induction in animal cap explants and causes defects in trunk and posterior development, while not affecting anterior development. This result suggests that FGF is necessary, but not sufficient, for induction of trunk and posterior mesoderm (for review, see Kessler and Melton, 1994). Noggin mRNA is oogenic, but - like FGF and BMP mRNA - it is not localized to the vegetal hemisphere. However, zygotic expression of noggin is interesting because it begins at the mid-blastula transition (MBT) in the organizer region and later in the dorsal mid-line of the archenteron roof. This puts it in a position to play an important role in either dorsalization and/or neural induction (Slack, 1994). It is noteworthy that when ventral marginal zone tissue is exposed to noggin protein, it induces muscle (Smith et al., 1993). Thus, noggin is a possible candidate for the third signal in the three signal model.

The Wnts are a diverse group of proteins related to the transforming int proteins of mammals and wingless in Drosophila. They were first implicated in Xenopus development by the demonstration that mouse wnt-1 overexpression could cause induction of ectopic dorsal axial structures (McMahon and Moon, 1989). This stimulated a search for the Xenopus homologues and discovery of a number of Xwnt genes. Of these Xwnt-11 is particularly intriguing. It will be discussed in one of the student presentations. Also to be discussed is Xbra, which encodes a nuclear protein that is apparently involved in transcriptional regulation of mesodermal fate.


References

Dale, L., G. Matthews, and A. Colman. 1993. Secretion and mesoderm inducing activity of the TGF-beta-related domain of Xenopus Vg1. EMBO J. 12: 4471-4480.

Kessler, D.S. and D. A. Melton. 1994. Vertebrate embryonic induction: mesodermal and neural patterning. Science 266: 596-604.

Kessler, D. S. and Melton, D. A. 1995. Induction of dorsal mesoderm by soluble, mature
Vg1 protein. Development 121: 2155-2164.

McMahon, A.P. and R.T. Moon. 1989. Ectopic expression of the proto-oncogene int-1 in Xenopus embryos leads to duplication of the embryonic axis. Cell 58: 1075-.1084.

Slack, J.M.W. 1994. Inducing factors in Xenopus early embryos. Current Biology 4: 116-126.

Smith, W.C., A.K. Knecht, M. Wu and R.M. Harland. 1993. Secreted noggin protein mimics the Spemann organizer in dorsalizing Xenopus mesoderm. Nature 361: 547-549.

References for Student Seminars

Cunliffe, V. and J.C. Smith. 1994. Specification of mesodermal pattern in Xenopus laevis by interactions between Brachyury, noggin and Xwnt-8. EMBO J. 13: 349-359.

Ku, M. and D.A. Melton. 1993. Xwnt-11: a maternally expressed Xenopus wnt gene. Development 119: 1161-1173.

RETURN TO ADVANCED DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY