Dynamic Development

CONTENTS

Main Page Dynamic Development

The Foundations of Developmental Biology

Gametogenesis

From Sperm and Egg to Embryo

Genetic Regulation of Development

Organizing the Multicellular Embryo

Generating Cell Diversity


Dynamic Development at a Glance


Learning Resources

Research Resources

The Developmental Biology Journal Club

Developmental Biology Tutorial

Roles of MRFs during Embryogenesis

What do the MRFs do in the embryo?

The roles of MRFs in promoting myogenesis in cultured cells suggest that they may also play a role in muscle development during embryogenesis. Most of the skeletal muscle in vertebrates originates from progenitor cells in the somites. The somites are condensations of paraxial mesoderm that later become compartmentalized into the dermamyotome dorsally and the sclerotome ventrally. The dermamyotome subdivides into the dermatome and the myotome. The medial myotomal cells form the axial musculature, and the lateral cells migrate to the limbs to form limb muscle.

(See Browder et al., 1991, pp. 293-298; Gilbert, 1997, pp. 341-348; Kalthoff, 1996, pp. 300-306; Shostak, 1991, pp. 648-651; Wolpert et al., 1998, pp. 97-100)

A role for MRFs in promoting muscle development during embryonic development is suggested by the location and timing of their expression during development. The MRFs are expressed sequentially in the somites, although details vary somewhat between species. In mice, the first MRF protein detected in trunk somites is Myf-5, which is first seen in medial somite cells (Fig. 1, Smith et al., 1994). Myogenin expression follows shortly after the initial detection of Myf-5, and MRF4 is expressed next. MyoD appearance is delayed and is first localized to the lateral portion of the somites. Initially, Myf-5 and MyoD expression is mutually exclusive and later overlaps (Fig. 3, Smith et al., 1994). Myf-5 and MyoD may be involved in establishing the two distinct subdomains of muscle: back musculature and limb musculature (Fig. 12, Ordahl and Le Douarin, 1992).

MRF knockouts

Data from knockout mice have helped to clarify the roles of the MRF genes in murine development. The initial null mouse experiments produced quite unexpected results: Mice that were null for either Myf-5 or MyoD genes developed normal amounts of skeletal muscle (Rudnicki et al., 1992; Braun et al., 1992). In homozygous MyoD null newborn mice, there was a 3- to 4-fold increase in Myf-5 expression. This gene is normally down-regulated after day 14 of development. The prolongation and enhancement of Myf-5 expression suggests that Myf-5 compensated for the lack of MyoD. In the Myf-5 knockouts, muscle development was delayed until MyoD was expressed, and then it proceeded (Braun et al., 1994). These observations suggest that MyoD and Myf-5 may be redundant. If so, does elimination of expression of both genes eliminate muscle development? The Myf-5 and MyoD mutant mice were interbred; the progeny that lacked both of these early-acting MRF genes were unable to initiate myogenesis, produced no myogenin and were devoid of skeletal muscle (Figs. 1, 2 , and 4, Rudnicki et al., 1993).

If myogenin is an essential intermediate in myogenesis, one would predict that myoblasts would form in myogenin knockout mice, but that skeletal muscle formation would be impaired. This is what has been observed, as shown in Figure 3 (Hasty et al., 1993) and Figure 3 (Nabeshima et al., 1993). The myogenin knock-out mice had deficient accumulation of transcripts for a number of muscle-specific proteins, including muscle creatine kinase, myosin heavy chain, the alpha and gamma subunits of the acetylcholine receptor and MRF4. However, normal amounts of MyoD transcripts were present, consistent with the hypothesis that MyoD acts upstream of myogenin (Fig. 5, Hasty et al., 1993). During development of myogenin knock-outs, somites developed normally and compartmentalized into myotome, dermatome and sclerotome (Fig. 1, Venuti et al., 1995). They even initiated muscle mass differentiation, but myosin heavy chain protein expression was attenuated, and myofibers were diffuse. The disparity between mutant and wild-type embryos widened as development continued (Fig. 4, Venuti et al., 1995). Large numbers of myoblasts that failed to differentiate appeared to be present in the mutant muscle masses.

The picture of myogenesis that is emerging is that MyoD and Myf-5 are partially redundant and initiate myogenesis in the myoblasts. They control expression of myogenin, which - in turn - controls myotube differentiation and may control expression of MRF4. MRF4 may be responsible for events in fully-differentiated myofibers, possibly by maintaining the differentiated state (Fig. 5, Rudnicki et al., 1993). According to this scheme, transcription of distinct sets of genes at each stage are regulated by MRFs, which also control the expression of the MRF that initiates the next stage of differentiation (Venuti et al., 1995).


Learning Objectives

  • Describe the compartmentalization of the somites.
  • Discuss the pattern of expression of the MRFs during development in the mouse.
  • Discuss the effects of the overexpression of XMyoD and XMyf-5 on early Xenopus development in vivo.
  • You had better review how knockout mice are made.
  • Describe the effects of knocking out either Mrf-5 or MyoD.
  • Describe the effects of knocking out both Mrf-5 and MyoD.
  • Describe the effects of knocking out the myogenin gene.
  • Derive a hierarchy of MRF gene expression based upon all the information you have received.


Digging Deeper:

Recent Literature

Arnold, H.-H. and Winter, B. 1998. Muscle differentiation: more complexity to the network of myogenic regulators. Curr. Opinion Genet. Develop. 8: 539-544.

Denetclaw, W.F. Jr, Christ, B. and Ordahl, C.P. 1997. Location and growth of epaxial myotome precursor cells. Development 124: 1601-1610.

Myer, A., Wagner, D.S., Vivian, J.L., Olson, E.N. and Klein, W.H. 1997. Wild-type myoblasts rescue the ability of myogenin-null myoblasts to fuse in vivo. Develop. Biol. 185: 127-138.

Yoon, J.K., Olson, E.N., Arnold, H.-H. and Wold, B.J. 1997. Different MRF4 knockout alleles differentially disrupt Myf-5 expression: cis-regulatory interactions at the MRF4/Myf-5 locus. Develop. Biol. 188: 349-362.


References

Braun, T., M.A. Rudnicki, H.-H. Arnold et al. 1992. Targeted inactivation of the muscle regulatory gene Myf-5 results in abnormal rib development and perinatal death. Cell 71: 369-382.

Braun, T., E. Bober, M.A. Rudnicki et al. 1994. MyoD expression marks the onset of skeletal myogenesis in Myf-5 mutant mice. Development 120: 3083-3092.

Browder, L.W., Erickson, C.A. and Jeffery, W.R. 1991. Developmental Biology. Third edition. Saunders College Pub. Philadelphia.

Gilbert, S.F. 1997. Developmental Biology. Fifth Edition. Sinauer. Sunderland, MA.

Hasty, P., A. Bradley, J.H. Morris et al. 1993. Muscle deficiency and neonatal death in mice with a targeted mutation in the myogenin gene. Nature 364: 501-506.

Kalthoff, K. 1996. Analysis of Biological Development. McGraw-Hill. New York.

Nabeshima, Y., K. Hanaoka, M. Hayasaka et al. 1993. Myogenin gene disruption results in perinatal lethality because of severe muscle defect. Nature 364: 532-535.

Ordahl, C.P. and N.M. Le Douarin. 1992. Two myogenic lineages within the developing somite. Development 114: 339-353.

Rudnicki, M.A., P.N.J. Schnegelsberg, R.H. Stead et al. 1993. MyoD or Myf-5 is required for the formation of skeletal muscle. Cell 75: 1351-1359.

Rudnicki, M.A., T. Braun, S. Hinuma et al. 1992. Inactivation of MyoD in mice leads to up-regulation of the myogenic HLH gene Myf-5 and results in apparently normal muscle development. Cell 71: 383-390.

Shostak, S. 1991. Embryology. An Introduction to Developmental Biology. HarperCollins. New York.

Smith, T.H., A.M. Kachinsky and J.B. Miller. 1994. Somite subdomains, muscle origins, and the four muscle regulatory proteins. J. Cell Biol. 127: 95-105.

Venuti, J.M., J.H. Morris, J.L. Vivian et al. 1995. Myogenin is required for late but not early aspects of myogenesis during mouse development. J. Cell Biol. 128: 563-576.

Wolpert, L., Beddington, R., Brockes, J., Jessell, T., Lawrence, P. and Meyerowitz, E. 1998. Principles of Development. Current Biology. London.


Dynamic Development at a Glance
Main Page Dynamic Development

Dynamic Development is a Virtual Embryo learning resource

This material may be reproduced for educational purposes only provided credit is given to the original source.
Leon Browder & Laurie Iten (Ed.) Dynamic Development
Last revised Thursday, November 5, 1998