Working Group on Infrared Astronomy
Groupe de Travail pour Astronomie Infrarouge
On Improving IR photometric passbands
A. T. Young1, E. F. Milone2, and C. R. Stagg2
Figures 8 through 25
![[Figure 8]](fig8.gif) |
Figure 8: The zenith transmission in the 1.03-micrometer window,
for the mid-latitude summer atmosphere at 1 km above sea level.
Note the reduced transmission, compared to Fig. 4

|
![[Figure 9]](fig9.gif) |
Figure 9: The zenith transmission in the J window, for the mid-latitude summer
atmosphere at 1 km above sea level.
Note the reduced transmission, compared to Fig. 4

|
![[Figure 10a]](fig10a.gif) |
Figure 10a: Optimization curves for the placement of the proposed "z" passband.
In this and other optimization plots, results are shown for two Kurucz
stellar atmosphere models: T = 3500K, log g = 0 and T = 35000 K, log g = 4.
The MODTRAN atmospheric model is for a site at 4.2 km at tropical latitudes,
namely Mauna Kea

|
![[Figure 10b]](fig10b.gif) |
Figure 10b: Optimization data for the determination of FWHM of the proposed "z" passband.
Here as in several other plots, the data are virtually identical for the 3500K
and 35000K sources and so are represented by the same symbols and lines.
Results for triangular ("*") and trapezoidal ("+") passbands with the same FWHM
and peak wavelength, but for a summer, mid-latitude site at 1 km altitude, are
also shown

|
![[Figure 11]](fig11.gif) |
Figure 11: Optimization data for the placement and FWHM determination of the
proposed "J" passband. Note that the dispersion in with wavelength is
minimal at 1.24 m. These results are for a 4.2 km tropical atmosphere but
the results for a 1 km atmosphere are quite similar

|
![[Figure 12]](fig12.gif) |
Figure 12: The zenith transmission in the H window, for the mid-latitude summer
atmosphere at 1 km above sea level

|
![[Figure 13a]](fig13a.gif) |
Figure 13a: Optimization curves for the placement of the proposed "H" passband.
The results shown are for a 1 km, mid-latitude summer MODTRAN model, but results
for higher altitude, drier sites are nearly identical

|
![[Figure 13b]](fig13b.gif) |
Figure 13b: Optimization data for the FWHM determination of the proposed "H" passband

|
![[Figure 14]](fig14.gif) |
Figure 14: The zenith transmission in the K window, for the mid-latitude summer
atmosphere at 1 km above sea level

|
![[Figure 15a]](fig15a.gif) |
Figure 15a: Optimization curves for the placement of the proposed "K" passband
for the tropical atmosphere at 4.2 km above sea level. The least value
occurs for a passband close to 2.2 m according to our simulations. We
suggest a peak just to the blue of this minimum, at 2.196 m to minimize
thermal atmospheric emission in the bandpass. This passband will give an
extinction curve nearly free of the Forbes effect

|
![[Figure 15b]](fig15b.gif) |
Figure 15b: Optimization data for the FWHM determination of the proposed "K" passband.
The curve for the 4.2 km MODTRAN model rises more slowly than it does for the
lower altitude sites.
See the text for a description of how this passband differs from other
K' passbands

|
![[Figure 16]](fig16.gif) |
Figure 16: The zenith transmission in the L and M windows,
for the mid-latitude summer atmosphere at 1 km above sea level.
The original Johnson L response, and a typical L' passband,
are superimposed on the L window for comparison

|
![[Figure 17a]](fig17a.gif) |
Figure 17a: Optimization curve for the placement of the proposed "L" and "L'"
passbands. Results are shown for a 1 km, mid-latitude, summer model.
The minimum suggests the advisability of at least two passbands, one near 3.6
and the other near 3.9 m. Our suggested passbands overlap slightly.

|
![[Figure 17b]](fig17b.gif) |
Figure 17b: Optimization data for the FWHM determination of the proposed "L" passband

|
![[Figure 17c]](fig17c.gif) |
Figure 17c: Optimization data for the FWHM determination of the proposed "L' "
passband in the cleaner part of the atmospheric window

|
![[Figure 18]](fig18.gif) |
Figure 18: The zenith transmission in the L and M windows,
for the tropical atmosphere at 4.2 km above sea level.
Compare to Fig. 16, which is for 1 km above sea level

|
![[Figure 19a]](fig19a.gif) |
Figure 19a: Optimization curve for the placement of the proposed "M" passband
for the tropical atmosphere at 4.2 km above sea level

|
![[Figure 19b]](fig19b.gif) |
Figure 19b: Optimization data for the FWHM determination of the proposed "M" passband.
The solid line is the response for a 3500K dwarf, the dashed line that for a
35000K giant. Note the identical results for the trapezoidal filter ("x"),
which has the same peak (4.675 m) and FWHM (0.114 m) as the suggested
triangular passband but also a flat maximum and slightly narrower base

|
![[Figure 20]](fig20.gif) |
Figure 20: The zenith transmission in the N window,
for the mid-latitude summer atmosphere at 1 km above sea level.
The band centered near 1040 cm-1 is due to ozone

|
![[Figure 21a]](fig21a.gif) |
Figure 21a: Optimization curves for the placement of the proposed "N" passband.
These results shown are for a 1 km mid-latitude site in summer. The curve
is for a passband with FWHM = 1.64 m; other data are given for 2.0 ("*")
m FWHM

|
![[Figure 21b]](fig21b.gif) |
Figure 21b: Optimization data for the FWHM determination of the proposed "N" passband
for several peak wavelength placements. Note that for FWHM values greater
than about 1.7 m, the lowest
values are achieved for a peak
wavelength of about 11.1 m

|
![[Figure 22a]](fig22a.gif) |
Figure 22a: Optimization curve for the placement of a proposed "n" passband. Although
the deepest minimum occurs at 9.11 m,
rises rapidly at longer
wavelengths so that we have suggested a peak wavelength closer to 9.0 m
(see Fig. 22b). Results for two terrestrial atmosphere models are shown

|
![[Figure 22b]](fig22b.gif) |
Figure 22b: Optimization data for the FWHM determination of a proposed "n" passband.
Results are shown for both 4.2 km, tropical atmosphere and a 1 km, summer,
mid-latitude atmosphere models. As in Fig. 22a, the differences for the two
stellar sources are negligible. Note the increase in with FWHM beyond
the apparent minimum for the passband peaking at 9.11 m ("+")

|
![[Figure 23]](fig23.gif) |
Figure 23: The zenith transmission in the NOPQ windows, for the tropical atmosphere at
4.2 km above sea level; Q is the greatly obscured window at the left, near
550 cm-1. The intense band centered near 667 cm-1 is due to carbon dioxide.
Fig. 20 shows the same region for a 1 km atmosphere model.

|
![[Figure 24a]](fig24a.gif) |
Figure 24a: Optimization curve for the placement of a proposed "Q" passband with FWHM=1.6
m, for a tropical atmosphere at 4.2 km above sea level. Note that the
minimum occurs near 18.08 m.

|
![[Figure 24b]](fig24b.gif) |
Figure 24b: Optimization data for the FWHM determination of a proposed "Q" passband for
a tropical atmosphere at 4.2 km above sea level. Results for peaks at 17.9
and 18.1 m are shown.

|
![[Figure 25]](fig25.gif) |
Figure 25: Various "L" passbands actually in use. Johnson's original L is the
long-dashed curve marked "L"; the others are filters used at several
observatories.

|
Posted on 17 July 2000 by: milone@ucalgary.ca.
All copyrights are held by the paper authors.